A rare New Music Review [but it's an old, old band]
Hackney Diamonds – The Rolling Stones [2023]
Short take: It’s the Rolling Stones,
they’re motivated and the producer kept the bullshit away.
It’s been a long time since we had an album of new material from the
Rolling Stones. Not yet another compilation with one or two new songs to force completists
into buying Tumbling Dice or Jumping Jack Flash for a 10th
or 20th time. Not yet another live Stones record. It’s been so long that
vinyl is back in style!
What’s been the hold up? Keith said “when the singer says he’s ready,
you go and record.” For his part, Jagger said they had demos that were okay but
they needed to knuckle down and set a deadline [which was how Jagger and
Richards had gotten over their mid 80s bickering charged into Steel Wheels]
and Richards agreed. New producer Andrew Watt picked about 20 songs from a
hundred plus [Did I mention it’s been a long time between albums?] demos and
the band got to work.
I admit I had to be a tad skeptical about new Stones music after Bridges
to Babylon and A Bigger Bang [sorry N8]. But my hopes were raised by
Angry. Angry is Rock & Roll – capital letters intended for
emphasis. Does it sound like they’re some auto-tuning going on? Yes. Maybe it’s
just there for effect. But the band is just kicking ass. One wondered if / how
much the late Charlie Watts would appear on the record [answer: 2 cuts]. I for
one could tell from one listen that this is Steve Jordan on the drums – Steve
has a heavy right foot. But the other joy was that the lyrics weren’t just
sophomoric generic “Let’s rock / I wanna rock you” lyrics. But Jagger is still
in fine voice – I mean he knows he has to take care of his instrument!
I really avoided getting into the hype so I could judge the album on its
own merits. I did track a compressed version this evening after work while
finishing up some things before going to the record store and I must say I was
impressed even with a low-fi version. I thought this was easily the most
cohesive and best album since Steel Wheels.
But then… hearing the words “featured” or “special guests” is usually a
bad sign. But they’re not there to overwhelm the Stones or dazzle with some virtuosity.
If you weren’t told that Paul McCartney was playing bass on Bite My Head Off,
you wouldn’t be able to tell it was Paul McCartney. There’s none of those
inventive bass lines one remembers from the Beatles. It’s just a straight ahead
rocker that wouldn’t have sounded out of place on Some Girls with a nice
simple guitar straight ahead solo by Ronnie. Probably Ronnie. Elton John on a
Rolling Stones record? Actually both Get Close and Live By the Sword are
nice middle of the road numbers. I really don’t hear the piano on Get Close
and it’s pretty deep in the mix on Sword, although there are a few fills
here and there. It really could be anyone playing. Sword is one of the
numbers that Charlie Watts is heard on [Mess It Up is the other and the
drums sound distinctly different on those cuts] and the number that Bill Wyman
played bass on. Stevie Wonder adding the gospel touches on piano on Sweet
Sounds Of Heaven, the same touch that Billy Preston [R.I.P.] would have
added in the 70s. It was probably a gas for those guys to get people almost
their own age in to play and swap old war stories. Lady Gaga – immensely talented
but her voice lacks… how can I say this… the soul of a Merry Clayton [or
touring vocalists Lisa Fisher or Sasha Allen]. That’s my opinion only!
Mick’s exaggerated English accent on [especially Whole Wide World]
is probably the worst offense on the record. Which really isn’t saying a whole
lot. Dreamy Skies could have slipped into that syrupy shit kicking voice
he uses occasionally but fortunately it doesn’t.
Keith’s vocal on
this record, Tell Me Straight is a haunting little cut in the mold of Slipping
Away. A damn fine vocal from Keith, too.
At the end it’s just Mick and Keith and the blues – covering Muddy
Waters Rollin’ Stone [aka Rolling Stone Blues].
The best way to sum up this record it’s the Rolling Stones and that’s
it. No bullshit. Just some almost guys still doing what they’ve been doing for
60 years – that’s 6 decades! That's older than me and a lot of you reading my take on this record!
Let’s also not forget, this is the Rolling Stones still breaking ground.
There are a couple of 80 year olds [Dylan, Paul] still making records but there
is NOT another 60 year old band full of seventy and 80 year old men still making
records.
The real fucking shame of it is that it took Charlie Watts’ passing for
the Stones to realize that their time really is limited and they’d better get
serious about their work. One hopes that when this publicity blitz is over,
they get back in and see if they can polish up some more diamonds. Because in
the end, it’s only the legend and the music that’s going to be left.
IF Hackney Diamonds turns out to be the last “official” album
[i.e. not a Tattoo You style collection of left overs that get
finished], it is a good one to go out on. This record sits proudly next to the
ones you know and have loved for years.
Bill
Graham put a line on the marquee of the Winterland announcing a set of Grateful
Dead shows: “They aren’t the best at what they do, they’re the only ones who do
what they do.” As a 60 year Rock & Roll band, the same can be said of the
Rolling Stones.
As to the marketing: Am I amazed [or disappointed] with the number of
cover variants ? Oh My God, yes! “In limited numbers” sure seems like a cash
grab, creating instant collector’s items. Couple of picture discs, one color
variant and one other cover variant. There are three CD issues also, the plain
jewel box, a digipack with a 64 page booklet or a deluxe package and a CD-DVD
[hi-res Dolby (surround?) mix and booklet. On the other hand, if people want to
plunk down their hard earned cash, the Stones and the record company would be
fools not to take it.